Feature-weighting picker for record summary software
How it works: give each of 13 criteria a weight from 0 to 3, or mark it a must-have, then enter your monthly volume. The picker scores all 25 products from the same dated facts as the feature matrix and the pricing matrix, and ranks them. It runs in your browser; nothing is sent or stored.
Limits: We read vendor websites, not contracts or invoices, and we didn't run the products on a shared test file: a "Not stated" cell means the vendor's pages didn't say, and quoted prices can differ.
Set your weights and volume
| Rank | Product | Score out of 100 | Est. per month | Missing must-haves or over budget |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Turn on JavaScript to rank with your own weights. | ||||
The default ranking, and why our product leads it
With the default weights and 4 files of 1,500 pages a month, the picker ranks the 25 products like this:
| Rank | Product | Score out of 100 | Est. per month |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Medrecords AI (ours) | 96 | $480 |
| 2 | MediScan | 73 | $620 |
| 3 | Chronos (Medchronos AI) | 62 | $160 |
| 4 | Legalyze | 61 | $1,196 |
| 5 | InPractice | 58 | $600 |
| 6 | Abstractive Health | 57 | $99 |
| 7 | CaseMark | 54 | $160 |
| 8 | Superinsight | 53 | $0 |
| 9 | BastionGPT | 52 | $45 |
| 10 | InjuryMgmt | 50 | $299 |
| 11 | Casefleet | 49 | $140 |
| 12 | NexLaw (ChronoVault) | 45 | $250 |
| 13 | Wisedocs | 42 | Not published |
| 14 | ProPlaintiff | 42 | Not published |
| 15 | TrialBase | 42 | Not published |
| 16 | OctopusLM | 39 | $300 |
| 17 | Hathr AI | 36 | $47 |
| 18 | Dodonai | 33 | $83.33 |
| 19 | EvenUp | 32 | Not published |
| 20 | Long Health (EvalPath) | 32 | Not published |
| 21 | IME Coach | 28 | $1,020 |
| 22 | Filevine (LOIS) | 26 | Not published |
| 23 | DigitalOwl | 16 | Not published |
| 24 | Eve | 13 | Not published |
| 25 | Supio | 11 | Not published |
Read this with the conflict in mind. Medrecords AI, which publishes this site, leads the default ranking. 2 reasons: it is the only product that states yes on all 10 feature and security columns, and the defaults weight page citations, a BAA and unbilled duplicates highly, which are terms it states. Change the weights and the order changes. With cost at 3, citations and chronology at 1 and everything else at 0, Superinsight, Casefleet, CaseMark and Chronos lead, and Medrecords AI drops out of the top 6.
How the score is calculated
- Feature criteria score 1 for Yes, 0.5 for Partly, 0 for Not stated or No. These are the same codes as the matrix, read off vendor sites on 2026-11-12.
- Cost scores 1 for the cheapest monthly estimate among products with a published price, 0 for the most expensive, and in proportion between. Products without a published price score 0 on cost.
- The score is the weighted average of all criteria, times 100. A must-have counts as weight 3 and also removes any product that scores 0 on it from the ranked list; those products drop to the bottom with the reason shown.
- The monthly estimate uses the same rules as the cost per file page: prepaid tiers by 12-month volume, monthly plans at the cheapest fit, seats times the per-user price.
Where the picker is weak
- It rewards vendors that publish. A product with many "Not stated" cells scores low even if it has the features. Wisedocs, DigitalOwl and EvenUp sell to large buyers and publish less; ask them before ruling them out.
- It scores claims, not quality. 2 products with "Yes" for page citations score the same, whatever their real hit rate. Run your top 3 on the same closed file.
- Seat-priced chat tools look cheap. Hathr AI and BastionGPT cost $45 to $47 for 1 user, but their sites don't state record-review features, so they score low unless you weight cost alone.
Weightings for 4 common buyers
| Buyer | Set to 3 or must have | Set to 0 |
|---|---|---|
| IME or QME physician | Page citations (must have), BAA, drafts reports | No subscription needed |
| Expert reviewer with large standard-of-care files | Page citations (must have), chronology, low cost | Drafts reports, SOC 2 |
| Hospital risk or quality team | BAA (must have), SOC 2, no training on your files | Price published |
| Clinic summarizing charts for care | BAA (must have), ask the file | Chronology, drafts reports |